Reuzel Grooming Hair Cream for Men – Subtle, Sugary Rum Fragrance – Low Shine Finish – Contains Moisturizing Properties – No Buildup – Natural, Pliable Hold – Suitable for All Hair Types – 3.38 Oz

I wasn’t too enthused when I first got this but after using it for a couple weeks, I noticed it gives my hair a nice, well groomed pattern. This really suits anyone that has that “James Dean” style hair. I put a little on evenly when my hair is wet and then blow dry it for a few minutes. Gives the perfect look I’m trying to go for. My hair has responded pretty well to it, unlike the last grooming cream I tried. Less hair is falling out and it holds well the day after if I haven’t washed my hair. I’m not crazy about the smell, but for now this will do.

I’m a male with longer hair. This is perfect addition to smooth on and hold done unruly areas.

The short version of this review is that I think this is a product that will make a very limited set of people happy that are looking for something very specific or don’t care about a lot of the trade-offs that come with making a product like this. It is tough to recommend for a general audience. For that small group, maybe it is four stars, but for everyone else, I’d say it’s two stars, so three overall. Let me get into the why…So to start, I’m big into music and headphones, and I own a total of 12 pairs. Four of those are “consumer” headphones like AirPods Pro 2, AirPods Max, Sennheiser True Wireless 3, and all of the rest are true HiFi headphones like Audeze, Focal, Fostex, Denon, etc. and all of the accompanying amplifiers and DACs. I generally enjoy lots of different genres of music – rock, alternative, R&B, hip-hop, pop, some classical. I just point this out, to point out I do a LOT of detailed sound comparisons and appreciate lots of different types of music and how different headphones may impact the experience.So, with these, I think there are only a few specific reasons one should even consider these, as if you don’t fall into BOTH #1 AND at least one of the other reasons below, there are far better options for this price.#1 – you really don’t like the “closed” feeling of buds and want a more “open” sound (and as such don’t care at all about noise isolation – both from outside and others hearing your listen, which is standard for any open setup)#2 – you don’t care about sound quality much but want some wireless buds that are stable enough to do light workouts in or just want some really small/discrete buds#3 – you primarily listen to music like jazz and classicalNow onto the logic and trade-offs.First, with respect to the sound. The tonal balance is extremely lacking in low end. The reviews that have said that these are a “balanced sound” are simply wrong. If you search around the net, you can see some sites have actually measured the frequency response of these, and not only is the bass very rolled off, it creeps up into the lower mids as well. This results in a very hollow listen. Music has nearly no low-end impact at all. Even with every bass setting cranked all the way up, it makes almost no noticeable difference because the drivers and design simply can’t handle it (which I’ll get back to). Further evidence of this, the EQ in the app only even goes down to 400Hz, which should be a sign, as most wouldn’t even consider it true “bass” until maybe 150Hz, and humans can hear down to 20Hz – yet the EQ doesn’t even let you adjust these frequencies. To call this balanced is just wrong. Good balanced headphones simply do not OVER-emphasize bass or let it bleed into the other frequencies – these lack bass, period. This is a very big difference if you listen to basically any Top 40 type music – hip-hop, pop, R&B, EDM, even rock or alternative. There will be no bass. This CAN be ok, however, if you’re a classical music listener or jazz or music that doesn’t have a lot of low-end (including bass drums, bass guitar, etc.). These would also be OK if you’re primarily going to use them for listening to voice stuff – podcasts, audiobooks, news, etc.The rest of the frequency response is overall just OK. You can adjust the mids and upper frequencies to your liking, and those adjustments make more of a difference than the bass adjustment, as I mentioned. So you can tone down or up the brightness to your liking, for example. They do an OK job at brining out detail, about what I would expect for buds in this price range. The semi-standout in the overall sound is the soundstage, or the way the music is presented in terms of position in space. Because of the “open” design, they are somewhat more natural sounding in terms of airiness and don’t have that “dome in your head” kind of feeling. That said, the stage itself is not hugely bigger than “regular” buds (goes ear to ear, maybe a tad outside the ear), it’s just a slightly more open stage. Because the buds are still sitting in your ear, versus when an over-ear open headphone has a driver sitting outside your ear, i would call these only semi-open sounding. The inside your head feeling is gone, but you still don’t get that great open naturalness of a true open-back headphone. The positioning is also good, meaning, individual pieces of the mix are fairly separated and identifiable, for this price range. The question is it worth the trade offs…Open back headphones of all types (buds, over-ear, etc.), all else equal, have less bass response than closed-backs. This is because there’s less pressure build up and resonance for the bass to build (in simple terms). So the tradeoff for losing that “in your head” feeling is less bass. Bigger, over ear headphones can counter this by using bigger drivers that can pump more bass and by still creating somewhat of a seal around your ear with the pads. in this case, these buds just sit in your ear, create no seal, and the drivers are tiny, so you get basically no bass. This is the biggest trade off of these. Whether that trade off is for you or not…your call.The other tradeoff is size. Smaller size leads to smaller drivers, which as I discussed means less bass, and it also means – way small batteries. Although the “up to” five hours of battery life may be accurate, there are some big issues with this. First, you have to turn off all of the electronic conveniences to hit this target – automatic voice detection, automatic volume adjustment, wide area tap – which are all pretty cool. Keep these on, and battery is more like two hours, which is FAR below, by more than half, what most buds get nowadays.Call performance is decent, and fit for me is also decent, though individual ears always vary with fit. The smallest included piece is what got me the best fit, and they are stable in my ears.What these actually remind me of are the first AirPods that were released, then upgraded to the AirPods Pro. The original AirPods also had a “sit in your ear” plastic design that was somewhat like this. While they were wireless and packed with nice new apple “magic” features, many had a view that they really still sounded like the $30 wired buds that came with iPods/iPhones at the time, but they were wireless. Then Apple released the AirPods Pro that claimed “far better sound”, and the biggest change was that they used a silicon tip to create a seal in the ear – and that added a way more appropriate low-end to the sound that was missing before, and NOW and AirPods Pro and Pro 2 are known as a mostly balanced set of buds. These are the opposite – by having no seal, combined with tiny drivers, I would say these have the sound profile of a $50 or less pair of buds, but you are paying for the true wireless stuff and fancy features. They MAY be worth it for you if you don’t mind the trade offs, but that’s not most.

So I usually use sea salt sprays as a pre styler but I just found they were too drying. I have thick, coarse, super straight hair and so that really didn’t work for me after so long trying. I decided to look for a grooming cream which will be moisture if and provide a bit of texture and grip and this is exactly what I was looking for.I can’t compare to any other grooming creams but if you’re looking for similar to me or have similar difficulties/hair to me, then this is a great choice.Hair feels soft but also moveable, can start styling my hair then follow with a matte paste or clay to put it in place. Exactly what I was looking for. Lovely product. Matte finish, not greasy. Lovely.

I’m not sure that I am necessarily in love with the aroma of this product but then again it doesn’t really smell all that bad. Might take some time to cultivate a nose for it. It definitely does the job nicely though … Just a wee dab in the palm of my hand, thoroughly smeared around in my just-washed-and-still-wet hair and I have instant moldability and hold.

This silver ware basket was something we had wanted to purchase for years since most of the areas on our basket have been broken out over the past 10-15 years. We just did not know our dishwasher’s model number and where to get the part. This basket matched our old Kitchen Aid silverware basket perfectly and was priced reasonably at 39.00. Thanks for the truly spiritual moment . . . Our silverware actually stays in this basket and there is more room to clean silverware items. I would buy from this seller again in a heartbeat if needed!! Thank you for providing me with a product of such great quality.

Replaced or old rack that had frustrating holes inn the bottom. This one fits and works great.

Works to get rid of frizz, give a little hold…pleasant enough, subtle scent.

The replacement silverware basket fits into the space in the dishwasher exactly as the old one did. The only discernible difference is the existence of an extra pocket in the rack. The old rack had 6 spaces for silverware, and the new one has 7. Otherwise, the quality is solid and the fit is correct. Recommended.